|
|
Post by verbaltoxin on Jul 9, 2012 21:18:40 GMT -6
Was slamjack the "last" gredunza champ? Nope. I got it in the Smackdown thread. So if it doesn't make it tonight, I'm the last Original Gredunza champion! It's already dead, as far as I'm concerned. |
|
|
|
Post by LucklessWonder on Jul 9, 2012 21:19:19 GMT -6
Was slamjack the "last" gredunza champ? Nope. I got it in the Smackdown thread. So if it doesn't make it tonight, I'm the last Original Gredunza champion! That's what you think. I will be Beltless Wonder no more. I will be teh Coy Duke (because screw Vance) of Gredunza champions... |
|
|
|
Post by nyrkah1 on Jul 9, 2012 21:20:40 GMT -6
Nope. I got it in the Smackdown thread. So if it doesn't make it tonight, I'm the last Original Gredunza champion! It's already dead, as far as I'm concerned. Just to make everyone roll their eyes at me: I was the Gredunza champ 10 times back when the Gredunza meant something. Yeah, I know it never really meant anything. |
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 21:22:42 GMT -6
I think I had 7 gredunzas, including the first Undisputed, first non-Dougie win after its creation, and the last of the original Gredunzas!
|
|
|
|
Post by verbaltoxin on Jul 9, 2012 21:23:54 GMT -6
Only 2 gredunzas. Only needed 1. 2 was a bonus. I've gotten that Last Man Standing thing 4 times though, I think. And I won the REAL World's Championship twice.
|
|
|
|
Post by commiepuddin on Jul 9, 2012 21:25:15 GMT -6
I am the Mr. Perfect of the Gredunza! Huzzah!
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 21:25:54 GMT -6
Add in the 318 posts we have here, and the FARK thread would be at its normal levels.
Plus, there would have been bullshitting before and after the thread, pushing it to the usual 1500 or so posts.
|
|
|
|
Post by slamjack on Jul 9, 2012 21:26:12 GMT -6
I botched over half of my gredunzas on purpose, but my first win was the last good RAW the day after WM, so that was pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dumb Ass Monkey on Jul 9, 2012 21:30:57 GMT -6
Sheamus/Swagger: 1:52 Tag match: 2:15 (ish) Clay/McIntyre: 0:35 Kane-Cena/Jerishow: 16:31 (including 6:10 of commercial interruptions) Cara/Slater: 1:43 Slater/Backlund: 0:39 (counting from handshake to release of chicken wing) Cole/Lawler: 0:56 Eve-Bryan/Lee-Punk: 3:18Total wrestling time on show: 27:49 (21:39 actually broadcast) 1299 Total time of show (approx., including commercials/intro): 129:00 Percentage of wrestling show devoted to wrestling matches: 21.5% (16.8% actually broadcast) EDIT -- didn't account for commercial interruptions. just posted that to WWE's FB page |
|
|
|
Post by verbaltoxin on Jul 9, 2012 21:32:29 GMT -6
Not watching WWE is the only sign you can send that will have....
*sunglasses on*
An Impact!
YYYYYYYYYYYYYEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by commiepuddin on Jul 9, 2012 21:32:54 GMT -6
Sheamus/Swagger: 1:52 Tag match: 2:15 (ish) Clay/McIntyre: 0:35 Kane-Cena/Jerishow: 16:31 (including 6:10 of commercial interruptions) Cara/Slater: 1:43 Slater/Backlund: 0:39 (counting from handshake to release of chicken wing) Cole/Lawler: 0:56 Eve-Bryan/Lee-Punk: 3:18Total wrestling time on show: 27:49 (21:39 actually broadcast) 1299 Total time of show (approx., including commercials/intro): 129:00 Percentage of wrestling show devoted to wrestling matches: 21.5% (16.8% actually broadcast) EDIT -- didn't account for commercial interruptions. just posted that to WWE's FB page Feel free to take credit, I'd rather not be tagged there. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by desertgeek on Jul 9, 2012 21:32:57 GMT -6
1- This part-timer in the FWC threads is here
2- I'm glad I didn't watch what sounded like an absolute abortion of a Raw show
3- They're taping Smackdown tonight as well. They were to be in Colorado Springs tomorrow for Smackdown, but it was cancelled for obvious reasons.
4- I know why this was created. Smiths and I have gone on about it. All I can say from my view point is that my TF subscription ends in 20 days and I've cancelled it from recurring. If Drew does the right thing, I'll reconsider the cancellation.
|
|
|
|
Post by LucklessWonder on Jul 9, 2012 21:36:11 GMT -6
Why did the make Show/Khali a tag team? They suck together.
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 21:41:30 GMT -6
Why did the make Show/Khali a tag team? They suck together. Because Vince hates you, and your tears are the lube he uses when he strokes his teeny wanger. |
|
|
|
Post by penguin31 on Jul 9, 2012 21:43:18 GMT -6
I watched WWF live in 1995 - heck, I still have King of the Ring '95 on VHS! And I've never seen the product this bad, and this consistently bad week to week.
Also: FWC North American Midcard Champion up in here.
|
|
|
|
Post by LucklessWonder on Jul 9, 2012 21:44:07 GMT -6
Random thought. Top 10 submission finishers in pro-graps history?
I figure the Figure Four and the Sharpshooter should be in there. Probably the Chicken wing. What else?
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 21:46:42 GMT -6
Random thought. Top 10 submission finishers in pro-graps history? I figure the Figure Four and the Sharpshooter should be in there. Probably the Chicken wing. What else? The Euthanasia Crossface? |
|
|
|
Post by LucklessWonder on Jul 9, 2012 21:47:20 GMT -6
Stalker Josh getting f*cked up by Bork Laser is kind of hilarious. I'm in my happy place, or back in April...
|
|
|
|
Post by LucklessWonder on Jul 9, 2012 21:48:02 GMT -6
Random thought. Top 10 submission finishers in pro-graps history? I figure the Figure Four and the Sharpshooter should be in there. Probably the Chicken wing. What else? The Euthanasia Crossface? I did consider making a Benoit joke, and tehn deleted it. |
|
|
|
Post by sharktrager on Jul 9, 2012 21:48:56 GMT -6
Dammit... I happened to check the post count and tried to get a gerdunza botch.
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 21:53:32 GMT -6
Honestly, I don't know why we couldn't come out and say "Hey, we have a facebook group and other boards we post at, come on by".
I mean, isn't part of the heart of the matter that it's okay to pimp your own personal paysites? These aren't even pay sites!
Just remember to post some flapjacks when you tell people where we went!
|
|
|
|
Post by sharktrager on Jul 9, 2012 22:00:13 GMT -6
One of the things Smiths has been banned for was pimping a free greasemonkey script that improves Fark, so...
Like I said, the whole thing goes beyond Smiths. I know some people think he got what he deserved. But when you look at some of his bans what's going on there is ridiculous. Hell, my only ban came for, correctly, pointing out the author of particularly bad Music headlines. I was told I was harassing a Farker. I wasn't the only one sick of the crap but they chose to let him keep at it until the Music tab got so bad it basically died.
That is the type of people Drew has in charge.
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 22:01:18 GMT -6
I know. I was being sarcastic.
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 22:03:37 GMT -6
Hm. I'm now an "Informative Member".
I haven't seen an informative member like that since my penis started explaining Planck's Constant to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by sharktrager on Jul 9, 2012 22:03:56 GMT -6
I'm tempted to do it. What are they going to do... ban me?
|
|
|
|
Post by verbaltoxin on Jul 9, 2012 22:04:20 GMT -6
I notice my stars keep going up. I must gain more stars!
|
|
|
|
Post by styckx on Jul 9, 2012 22:05:23 GMT -6
Fark used to be a lot of fun in every thread as someone pointed out though it's to the point I can see a headline now and have a blueprint of what the conversation in the thread already worked out before even reading it.. I'm about 90% accurate most of the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 22:11:01 GMT -6
Fark used to be a lot of fun in every thread as someone pointed out though it's to the point I can see a headline now and have a blueprint of what the conversation in the thread already worked out before even reading it.. I'm about 90% accurate most of the time. And Christ, the Brony threads... I get a post deleted for telling someone who is absolutely, positively, 100% trolling "you're a troll", and the troll just keeps on going. And the best part... the note on my deleted post is that it was deleted because I was trolling! That's like arresting someone who was mugged because they still have their own wallet. |
|
|
|
Post by styckx on Jul 9, 2012 22:12:55 GMT -6
Fark used to be a lot of fun in every thread as someone pointed out though it's to the point I can see a headline now and have a blueprint of what the conversation in the thread already worked out before even reading it.. I'm about 90% accurate most of the time. And Christ, the Brony threads... I get a post deleted for telling someone who is absolutely, positively, 100% trolling "you're a troll", and the troll just keeps on going. You serious? Spotting the trolls was the last great hobby left on Fark.. You can't even do that now without possible repercussions? |
|
|
|
Post by First National Bastard on Jul 9, 2012 22:17:08 GMT -6
And Christ, the Brony threads... I get a post deleted for telling someone who is absolutely, positively, 100% trolling "you're a troll", and the troll just keeps on going. You serious? Spotting the trolls was the last great hobby left on Fark.. You can't even do that now without possible repercussions? Yep. This wasn't just the average, garden variety person who wanders into a pony thread to fuck with people, this was a 14 posts in a 20 minutes, two or three posts in a row, doing everything but advocating people who like MLP be rounded up and shot, obvious troll. And I finally quote him and say "You're a troll, and your pathetic" or something to that effect, and I get my post deleted for trolling, while he merrily keeps trolling along. |
|
